State v. Childers

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

State v. Childers

1927 OK CR 105, 254 P. 1118, 36 Okla. Crim. 385, 1927 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 212

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 2, 1927

DocketNo. A-6459.

StatusPublished

This text of 1927 OK CR 105 (State v. Childers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Childers, 1927 OK CR 105, 254 P. 1118, 36 Okla. Crim. 385, 1927 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 212 (Okla. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this case an information, based on sections 6119, 6120, and 6121, C. S. 1921, was filed in the county court of Oklahoma county. To this information a demurrer was interposed, and the same was by the judgment of the court sustained. The state appealed from' this judgment. March 29, 1927, the following motion to dismiss the appeal was filed: “Come now C. H. Ruth and J. K. Wright, county attorney of Oklahoma county, Oklahoma, attorneys of record herein for the state of Oklahoma, plaintiff in error, and move the court to dismiss the appeal on the part of the state of Oklahoma against C. C. Childers, defendant in error, from a judgment of the county court of Oklahoma county, Oklahoma. C. H. Ruth, J. K. Wright, County Attorney of Oklahoma *386 County, at the Request of >C. H. Ruth.” It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the motion to dismiss the appeal be sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this case an information, based on sections 6119, 6120, and 6121, C. S. 1921, was filed in the county court of Oklahoma county. To this information a demurrer was interposed, and the same was by the judgment of the court sustained. The state appealed from' this judgment. March 29, 1927, the following motion to dismiss the appeal was filed: “Come now C. H. Ruth and J. K. Wright, county attorney of Oklahoma county, Oklahoma, attorneys of record herein for the state of Oklahoma, plaintiff in error, and move the court to dismiss the appeal on the part of the state of Oklahoma against C. C. Childers, defendant in error, from a judgment of the county court of Oklahoma county, Oklahoma. C. H. Ruth, J. K. Wright, County Attorney of Oklahoma *386 County, at the Request of >C. H. Ruth.” It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the motion to dismiss the appeal be sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1927 OK CR 105, 254 P. 1118, 36 Okla. Crim. 385, 1927 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-childers-oklacrimapp-1927.