State v. Cheatham

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Cheatham

576 So. 2d 33, 1991 La. LEXIS 521, 1991 WL 25993

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Cheatham. Read the opinion of the Court — 523 So. 2d 228 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 1, 1991·No. No. 91-KH-0241·Published

Opinion

In re Cheatham, Willie; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “C”, No. 329-527.

Denied. Relator should follow the directive of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal and petition the appropriate custodian of the records sought by utilizing the procedures set forth in the Public Records Law. See, La.R.S. 44:1, et seq. Relator should follow the procedures set forth in La.R.S. 44:35 in the event that a request to the records’ custodian is denied or is not answered timely.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Cheatham, Willie; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “C”, No. 329-527.

Denied. Relator should follow the directive of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal and petition the appropriate custodian of the records sought by utilizing the procedures set forth in the Public Records Law. See, La.R.S. 44:1, et seq. Relator should follow the procedures set forth in La.R.S. 44:35 in the event that a request to the records’ custodian is denied or is not answered timely.

State v. Cheatham, 576 So. 2d 33, 1991 La. LEXIS 521, 1991 WL 25993 (La. 1991).

Pincite

576 So. 2d 33 (State v. Cheatham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.