State v. Chavis
229 S.E.2d 33, 290 N.C. 778, 1976 N.C. LEXIS 1203
This text of 229 S.E.2d 33 (State v. Chavis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Chavis, 229 S.E.2d 33, 290 N.C. 778, 1976 N.C. LEXIS 1203 (N.C. 1976).
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Joseph D. CHAVIS.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Joseph D. Chavis, in pro. per.
*34 Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., Richard F. Kane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for State.
Petition by defendant for discretionary review under GS 7A-31, 30 N.C.App. 75, 226 S.E.2d 389. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Chavis
226 S.E.2d 389 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1976)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
229 S.E.2d 33, 290 N.C. 778, 1976 N.C. LEXIS 1203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-chavis-nc-1976.