State v. Chavis
This text of 214 S.E.2d 434 (State v. Chavis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Benjamin CHAVIS et al.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Mathias P. Hunoval, Chambers, Stein & Ferguson, Charles L. Becton, John H. Harmon, Frank Ballance, for defendants.
Robert Morgan, Atty. Gen., Charles M. Hensey, Asst. Atty. Gen., Archie W. Anders, Associate Atty., C. Diederich Heidgerd, Associate Atty., for the State.
Petition by defendants for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals, 24 N.C.App. 148, 210 S.E.2d 555. Denied. Motion of the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question. Allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
214 S.E.2d 434, 287 N.C. 261, 1975 N.C. LEXIS 1104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-chavis-nc-1975.