State v. Chavez
Opinion
ORDER
Elizes Chavez (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting Defendant of third-degree assault, in violation of Section 565.070. 1 Pursuant to Section 565.070.4, *490 the trial court entered judgment against Defendant for a Class D felony and sentenced Defendant to four years’ imprisonment because he had two prior convictions for third-degree assault of a “family or household member.” We find no error and affirm.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the ■ judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
. All statutory references are to RSMo.2000, unless otherwise indicated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
333 S.W.3d 489 (State v. Chavez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.