State v. Chatman

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Chatman

886 S.W.2d 163, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1665, 1994 WL 583915

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 25, 1994·No. No. 65066·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis for attempted possession of a controlled substance, § 564.011, RSMo Supp.1986. The court sentenced defendant as a persistent offender to a term of eight years’ imprisonment. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. Rule 80.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis for attempted possession of a controlled substance, § 564.011, RSMo Supp.1986. The court sentenced defendant as a persistent offender to a term of eight years’ imprisonment. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. Rule 80.25(b).

State v. Chatman, 886 S.W.2d 163, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1665, 1994 WL 583915 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

886 S.W.2d 163 (State v. Chatman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.