State v. Charron
This text of 504 P.3d 1287 (State v. Charron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Submitted December 30, 2021; portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay attorney fees reversed, otherwise affirmed February 16, 2022
STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. WILLIAM JAY CHARRON, Defendant-Appellant. Josephine County Circuit Court 19CR27426; A172798 504 P3d 1287
Matthew G. Galli, Judge. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Matthew Blythe, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Joanna L. Jenkins, Assistant Attor- ney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Tookey, Presiding Judge, and Aoyagi, Judge, and Armstrong, Senior Judge. PER CURIAM Portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay attorney fees reversed; otherwise affirmed. Cite as 317 Or App 652 (2022) 653
PER CURIAM In this criminal appeal, defendant assigns error to the trial court’s refusal to give his requested less-satisfactory- evidence jury instruction. We reject that assignment of error. Defendant also assigns plain error to the trial court’s imposition of court-appointed attorney fees, arguing that the record lacked evidence to support a finding that he has the ability to pay attorney fees. The state concedes the error; we accept the concession. We also exercise our discretion to correct the error because, under the circumstances here, it is worth correcting given the seriousness of the error. Portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay attorney fees reversed; otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
504 P.3d 1287, 317 Or. App. 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-charron-orctapp-2022.