State v. Charpentier

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

State v. Charpentier

377 A.2d 131, 117 N.H. 647, 1977 N.H. LEXIS 400

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedAugust 1, 1977

DocketNo. 7719; No. 7720

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 377 A.2d 131 (State v. Charpentier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Charpentier, 377 A.2d 131, 117 N.H. 647, 1977 N.H. LEXIS 400 (N.H. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum Opinion

The issue before this court is whether defendants’ motion for late appeal was properly denied by the Superior Court (Goode, J.). On May 3, 1976, Roland Charpentier was convicted by the Nashua District Court for leaving the scene of an accident. On April 27, 1976, Gregory L. Morse was convicted for possession of marijuana. Appearance cards were filed for defendant Charpentier in the Hillsborough County Superior Court on May 3, 1976, and for defendant Morse on April 28, 1976. The superior court entered both appearances on May 6, 1976. The district court complaints were never transferred to the superior court for appeal. On August 16, 1976, defense counsel filed motions for late appeal with the superior court. The motions were denied and all questions of law were reserved and transferred.

[648]*648Under RSA 599:1, the time for an appeal to be entered may be extended by the superior court if good cause is shown. RSA 491: App. R.54 (Supp. 1975) states that motions grounded upon facts must be “. . . verified upon affidavit, or . . . apparent from the record or from the papers on file in the case . . . .” Defendants presented no affidavits establishing the filing of timely appeals, authenticating their claims of clerical error in the district court clerk’s office, or the payment of appeal fees. Therefore, defendants’ motion for late entry was correctly denied because they failed to meet their statutory burden of showing good cause under RSA 599:1.

Defendants’ exceptions overruled.

Grimes, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum Opinion

The issue before this court is whether defendants’ motion for late appeal was properly denied by the Superior Court (Goode, J.). On May 3, 1976, Roland Charpentier was convicted by the Nashua District Court for leaving the scene of an accident. On April 27, 1976, Gregory L. Morse was convicted for possession of marijuana. Appearance cards were filed for defendant Charpentier in the Hillsborough County Superior Court on May 3, 1976, and for defendant Morse on April 28, 1976. The superior court entered both appearances on May 6, 1976. The district court complaints were never transferred to the superior court for appeal. On August 16, 1976, defense counsel filed motions for late appeal with the superior court. The motions were denied and all questions of law were reserved and transferred.

[648]*648Under RSA 599:1, the time for an appeal to be entered may be extended by the superior court if good cause is shown. RSA 491: App. R.54 (Supp. 1975) states that motions grounded upon facts must be “. . . verified upon affidavit, or . . . apparent from the record or from the papers on file in the case . . . .” Defendants presented no affidavits establishing the filing of timely appeals, authenticating their claims of clerical error in the district court clerk’s office, or the payment of appeal fees. Therefore, defendants’ motion for late entry was correctly denied because they failed to meet their statutory burden of showing good cause under RSA 599:1.

Defendants’ exceptions overruled.

Grimes, J., did not sit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

377 A.2d 131, 117 N.H. 647, 1977 N.H. LEXIS 400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-charpentier-nh-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack