State v. Charlton

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Charlton

803 N.E.2d 808, 101 Ohio St. 3d 206

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 3, 2004

DocketNo. 2003-1490

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 803 N.E.2d 808 (State v. Charlton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Charlton, 803 N.E.2d 808, 101 Ohio St. 3d 206 (Ohio 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court on the authority of State v. Comer, 99 Ohio St.3d 463, 2003-Ohio-4165, 793 N.E.2d 473.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Jeffrey H. Manning, Lorain County Prosecuting Attorney, and Anthony D. Cilio, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. David H. Bodiker, State Public Defender, and Robert L. Lane, Chief Appellate Counsel, for appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court on the authority of State v. Comer, 99 Ohio St.3d 463, 2003-Ohio-4165, 793 N.E.2d 473.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Jeffrey H. Manning, Lorain County Prosecuting Attorney, and Anthony D. Cilio, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. David H. Bodiker, State Public Defender, and Robert L. Lane, Chief Appellate Counsel, for appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

803 N.E.2d 808, 101 Ohio St. 3d 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-charlton-ohio-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack