State v. Charlton

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Charlton

803 N.E.2d 808, 101 Ohio St. 3d 206

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 3, 2004·No. No. 2003-1490·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court on the authority of State v. Comer, 99 Ohio St.3d 463, 2003-Ohio-4165, 793 N.E.2d 473.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Jeffrey H. Manning, Lorain County Prosecuting Attorney, and Anthony D. Cilio, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. David H. Bodiker, State Public Defender, and Robert L. Lane, Chief Appellate Counsel, for appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court on the authority of State v. Comer, 99 Ohio St.3d 463, 2003-Ohio-4165, 793 N.E.2d 473.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Jeffrey H. Manning, Lorain County Prosecuting Attorney, and Anthony D. Cilio, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. David H. Bodiker, State Public Defender, and Robert L. Lane, Chief Appellate Counsel, for appellant.

State v. Charlton, 803 N.E.2d 808, 101 Ohio St. 3d 206 (Ohio 2004).

Pincite

803 N.E.2d 808 (State v. Charlton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related