State v. Charles Investment Corp.
376 A.2d 534, 151 N.J. Super. 14, 1977 N.J. Super. LEXIS 974
Opinion
The judgment of the Superior Court, Law Division, is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Bilder.
Despite the suggestion of the condemnee, the specific circumstances of this case satisfy us that Washington Market Enterprises v. Trenton, 68 N. J. 107 (19751. has no application.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Charles Investment Corp., 376 A.2d 534, 151 N.J. Super. 14, 1977 N.J. Super. LEXIS 974 (N.J. Ct. App. 1977).
376 A.2d 534 (State v. Charles Investment Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Weiswasser
671 A.2d 121 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1996)
STATE BY COMM'R OF TRANSP. v. Charles Investment Corporation
376 A.2d 534 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1977)