State v. Charbonneau
Opinion
Filed 12/21/10 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2010 ND 237
Mervin Gajewski as
next friend of all North
Dakotans including intact
minor males, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
The State of North Dakota
and Wayne Stenehjem, Attorney
General, Defendants and Appellees
No. 20100231
Appeal from the District Court of McKenzie County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Gerald H. Rustad, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Mervin Gajewski, self-represented (on brief), 14342 34th Street NW, Alexander, N.D. 58831-9556, plaintiff and appellant.
Douglas A. Bahr, Solicitor General (on brief), Office of Attorney General, 500 North Ninth Street, Bismarck, N.D. 58501-4509, for defendants and appellees.
Gajewski v. State
No. 20100231
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Mervin Gajewski appeals from a district court order denying his motion to vacate judgment. Claiming to act in the capacity of “next friend,” Gajewski argues the order unconstitutionally denies minor males their due process and equal protection rights. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) and (4).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2010 ND 246 (State v. Charbonneau) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.