State v. Chappell

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

State v. Chappell

1915 OK CR 270, 152 P. 1199, 12 Okla. Crim. 618, 1915 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 266

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided November 20, 1915·No. No. A-1754.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this ease the state attempted to appeal from the judgment of the district court of .Logan county sustaining a demurrer to an indictment for burglary with intent to mutilate election certificates. The defendant in error has filed a motion to dismiss said appeal, "because the certified transcript attached to the petition in error does not show that the notice of appeal required by law was served upon the defendant in error, or upon the clerk, of the district court, as provided by law.’7 The motion to dismiss we find is well taken. The attempted appeal herein by the State is therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this ease the state attempted to appeal from the judgment of the district court of .Logan county sustaining a demurrer to an indictment for burglary with intent to mutilate election certificates. The defendant in error has filed a motion to dismiss said appeal, "because the certified transcript attached to the petition in error does not show that the notice of appeal required by law was served upon the defendant in error, or upon the clerk, of the district court, as provided by law.’7 The motion to dismiss we find is well taken. The attempted appeal herein by the State is therefore dismissed.

State v. Chappell, 1915 OK CR 270, 152 P. 1199, 12 Okla. Crim. 618, 1915 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 266 (Okla. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

1915 OK CR 270 (State v. Chappell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related