State v. Chapman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Chapman

96 S.E.2d 721, 245 N.C. 592, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 605

DecidedFebruary 27, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 96 S.E.2d 721 (State v. Chapman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Chapman, 96 S.E.2d 721, 245 N.C. 592, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 605 (N.C. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from an order of Judge Froneberger directing execution of a suspended prison sentence imposed by previous judgment entered at the May Term, 1955, by Judge Pless.

Judge Froneberger, after hearing evidence pro and con, found that the defendant had violated conditions upon which the original judgment was suspended. Our examination of the record discloses that the findings are supported by the evidence. This suffices to sustain the order activating the suspended sentence.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from an order of Judge Froneberger directing execution of a suspended prison sentence imposed by previous judgment entered at the May Term, 1955, by Judge Pless.

Judge Froneberger, after hearing evidence pro and con, found that the defendant had violated conditions upon which the original judgment was suspended. Our examination of the record discloses that the findings are supported by the evidence. This suffices to sustain the order activating the suspended sentence.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 S.E.2d 721, 245 N.C. 592, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-chapman-nc-1957.