State v. Chapman

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Chapman

233 S.W.3d 233, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1336, 2007 WL 2702188

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 18, 2007

DocketED 88887

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 233 S.W.3d 233 (State v. Chapman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Chapman, 233 S.W.3d 233, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1336, 2007 WL 2702188 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Howard B. Chapman, appeals from the judgment entered after re-sentencing on that portion of a jury verdict finding him guilty of five counts of rape, in violation of section 566.030 RSMo (1986), and three counts of forcible sodomy, in violation of Section 566.060 RSMo (1986). Pursuant to the jury’s recommendation, the trial court sentenced defendant to fifteen years imprisonment on each count. It ordered the sentences to be served consecutively.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is afHrmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI