State v. Chapman
614 A.2d 827, 223 Conn. 923, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 331
This text of 614 A.2d 827 (State v. Chapman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Chapman, 614 A.2d 827, 223 Conn. 923, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 331 (Colo. 1992).
Opinion
The state of Connecticut’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 28 Conn. App. 360, is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the statutory alternative analysis set forth in State v. [924]*924Williams, 202 Conn. 349, 363-64 (1987), applied to alternative language occurring within the same statutory subsection and that the trial court’s instruction permitted the jury to consider a separate and distinct theory of criminal liability?
“2. Was the Appellate Court correct in its failure to consider whether any error in the trial court’s charge was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Dinoto
642 A.2d 717 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)
State v. Chapman
632 A.2d 674 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1993)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
614 A.2d 827, 223 Conn. 923, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-chapman-conn-1992.