State v. Chapel
This text of 23 S.W. 760 (State v. Chapel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The charging portion of the indictment under which the defendant was tried and convicted is as follows: “That, on or about the twenty-eighth day of September, 1892, at the county of Newton and state "of Missouri, one, Marius Chapel, did then and there unlawful and feloniously, with intent to [641]*641cheat and defraud, obtain from Frank Featherstun $14.60, lawful money of the United States of the value of $14.60 — the money of Frank Featherstun — by means and by use of a cheat, a fraud, a trick, a deception, a false and fraudulent representation and statement and false pretense, a bogus written instrument, contrary to the form of the statutes and against the peace and dignity of the state.”
Under the ruling of this court in State v. Terry, 109 Mo. 601; State v. Benson, 110 Mo. 18; State v. Cameron, ante, p. 371; State v. Fleming, ante, p. 377; the indictment in this cause is wholly insufficient in the particulars in those cases specified, and therefore judgment reversed and defendant discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 S.W. 760, 117 Mo. 639, 1893 Mo. LEXIS 383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-chapel-mo-1893.