State v. Chaney

Nebraska Supreme Court

State v. Chaney

234 N.W.2d 620, 194 Neb. 684, 1975 Neb. LEXIS 882

Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided November 6, 1975·No. No. 40142·Published

Opinion

Spencer, J.

Defendant, following a plea bargain resulting in the amendment of a burglary charge to one of grand larceny, pled guilty. He appeals a sentence of 2 years in the Penal and Correctional Complex as excessive. Defendant had a previous felony conviction from which he was paroled in 1972, and discharged in 1974. The appeal is frivolous, and the judgment is affirmed.

See Rule 20. See, also, State v. Orner (1974), 192 Neb. 523, 222 N. W. 2d 819, in which we held: “A sentence imposed within the statutory limits will not be disturbed on appeal without a showing of an abuse of discretion by the sentencing court.”

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spencer, J.

Defendant, following a plea bargain resulting in the amendment of a burglary charge to one of grand larceny, pled guilty. He appeals a sentence of 2 years in the Penal and Correctional Complex as excessive. Defendant had a previous felony conviction from which he was paroled in 1972, and discharged in 1974. The appeal is frivolous, and the judgment is affirmed.

See Rule 20. See, also, State v. Orner (1974), 192 Neb. 523, 222 N. W. 2d 819, in which we held: “A sentence imposed within the statutory limits will not be disturbed on appeal without a showing of an abuse of discretion by the sentencing court.”

Affirmed.

State v. Chaney, 234 N.W.2d 620, 194 Neb. 684, 1975 Neb. LEXIS 882 (Neb. 1975).

Pincite

234 N.W.2d 620 (State v. Chaney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related