State v. Chaney

234 N.W.2d 620, 194 Neb. 684, 1975 Neb. LEXIS 882
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 6, 1975
DocketNo. 40142
StatusPublished

This text of 234 N.W.2d 620 (State v. Chaney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Chaney, 234 N.W.2d 620, 194 Neb. 684, 1975 Neb. LEXIS 882 (Neb. 1975).

Opinion

Spencer, J.

Defendant, following a plea bargain resulting in the amendment of a burglary charge to one of grand larceny, pled guilty. He appeals a sentence of 2 years in the Penal and Correctional Complex as excessive. Defendant had a previous felony conviction from which he was paroled in 1972, and discharged in 1974. The appeal is frivolous, and the judgment is affirmed.

See Rule 20. See, also, State v. Orner (1974), 192 Neb. 523, 222 N. W. 2d 819, in which we held: “A sentence imposed within the statutory limits will not be disturbed on appeal without a showing of an abuse of discretion by the sentencing court.”

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Orner
222 N.W.2d 819 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
234 N.W.2d 620, 194 Neb. 684, 1975 Neb. LEXIS 882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-chaney-neb-1975.