State v. Chandler

814 N.E.2d 835, 103 Ohio St. 3d 132
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 22, 2004
DocketNos. 2003-0765 and 2003-0766
StatusPublished

This text of 814 N.E.2d 835 (State v. Chandler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Chandler, 814 N.E.2d 835, 103 Ohio St. 3d 132 (Ohio 2004).

Opinions

{¶ 1} The judgments of the court of appeals are affirmed on the authority of State v. Brooks, 103 Ohio St.3d 134, 2004-Ohio-4746, 814 N.E.2d 837.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and O’Connor, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs in part and dissents in part. O’Donnell, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Brooks
814 N.E.2d 837 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
814 N.E.2d 835, 103 Ohio St. 3d 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-chandler-ohio-2004.