State v. Champion

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Champion

501 S.W.3d 497, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1015, 2016 WL 5888942

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 11, 2016·No. WD 78414·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM

Sterling Champion challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction for first-degree forcible sodomy. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the conviction. Because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reason for our decision.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM

Sterling Champion challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction for first-degree forcible sodomy. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the conviction. Because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reason for our decision.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Champion, 501 S.W.3d 497, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1015, 2016 WL 5888942 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

501 S.W.3d 497 (State v. Champion) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.