State v. Champagne

452 So. 2d 1287, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 9065
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Champagne. Read the opinion of the Court — 1987 La. App. LEXIS 9510
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided June 27, 1984·No. No. CR83-696·Published

Opinion

GUIDRY, Judge.

The defendant, Nathan Champagne, pleaded guilty to the charge of attempted [1288]*1288forcible rape, a violation of LSA-R.S. 14:42.1 and 14:27, on November 15, 1982. On April 29, 1983, after a pre-sentence investigation, the trial judge sentenced the defendant to seventeen years at hard labor. The defendant has appealed the sentence.

The defendant filed no assignments of error pursuant to LSA-C.Cr.P. Art. 844. Therefore, the scope of appellate review in this case is limited to a review of the pleadings and proceedings, without inspection of the evidence, for errors patent. LSA-C. Cr.P. Art. 920; State v. Zeno, 322 So.2d 136 (La.1975). We have carefully examined the record in this case pursuant to the mandate of LSA-C.Cr.P. Art. 920, and finding no errors patent on the face of the record, we affirm the defendant’s conviction and the sentence imposed.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Champagne, 452 So. 2d 1287, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 9065 (La. Ct. App. 1984).

452 So. 2d 1287 (State v. Champagne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Zeno
322 So. 2d 136 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1975)