State v. Chambliss

930 N.E.2d 335, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1518
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Chambliss. Read the opinion of the Court — 128 Ohio St. 3d 507
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 22, 2010·No. 2008-2251·Published

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 91272, 2008-Ohio-3800 and 2008-Ohio-5285. It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that this cause is no longer held for the decision in 2008-0991 and 2008-0992, Chojnacki v. Cordray, 126 Ohio St.3d 321, 2010-Ohio-3212, 933 N.E.2d 800, and briefing shall proceed.

It is ordered by the court that the Clerk shall issue an order for the transmission of the record from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, and the parties shall brief this case in accordance with S.CtPrac.R. 6.2-6.4.

Pfeifer, J., dissents and would dismiss the appeal as having been improvidently accepted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Chambliss, 930 N.E.2d 335, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1518 (Ohio 2010).

930 N.E.2d 335 (State v. Chambliss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chojnacki v. Cordray
2010 Ohio 3212 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)
State v. Chambliss, 91272 (7-31-2008)
2008 Ohio 3800 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)
State v. Chambliss, 91272 (10-9-2008)
2008 Ohio 5285 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)