State v. Chambers

204 S.E.2d 560, 21 N.C. App. 450, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 1836
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided May 1, 1974·No. No. 7426SC317·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BRITT, Judge.

The sole assignment of error presented by defendant is that the trial court erred in charging the jury that they might return a verdict of involuntary manslaughter and providing instructions on that offense. Defendant argues that there was no evidence to support the offense of involuntary manslaughter.

The assignment has no merit. Assuming, arguendo, that there was no evidence to support the offense of involuntary manslaughter, the error was favorable to defendant and she is without standing to challenge the verdict finding her guilty of that offense. State v. Vestal, 283 N.C. 249, 195 S.E. 2d 297 (1973), cert. den. 414 U.S. 874, 94 S.Ct. 157, 38 L.Ed. 2d 114; State v. Rogers, 273 N.C. 208, 159 S.E. 2d 525 (1968); State v. Simpson, 14 N.C. App. 456, 188 S.E. 2d 535 (1972).

No error.

Judges Hedrick and Carson concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Chambers, 204 S.E.2d 560, 21 N.C. App. 450, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 1836 (N.C. Ct. App. 1974).

204 S.E.2d 560 (State v. Chambers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Commonwealth
737 S.W.2d 683 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 1987)
State v. Bass
244 S.E.2d 458 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1978)