State v. Chambers

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Chambers

345 S.W.3d 894, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1056, 2011 WL 3567495

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 16, 2011

DocketWD 71867

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 345 S.W.3d 894 (State v. Chambers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Chambers, 345 S.W.3d 894, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1056, 2011 WL 3567495 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Tarchechee Chambers was found guilty of first-degree burglary and violation of an order of protection. He appeals, arguing that the trial court erred by allowing testimony regarding the victim’s post-incident conduct, and by permitting the State to highlight the uncontroverted nature of its evidence during closing argument, which purportedly shifted the burden of proof to Chambers and indirectly commented upon his failure to testify. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Tarchechee Chambers was found guilty of first-degree burglary and violation of an order of protection. He appeals, arguing that the trial court erred by allowing testimony regarding the victim’s post-incident conduct, and by permitting the State to highlight the uncontroverted nature of its evidence during closing argument, which purportedly shifted the burden of proof to Chambers and indirectly commented upon his failure to testify. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

345 S.W.3d 894, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1056, 2011 WL 3567495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-chambers-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack