State v. Chambers

345 S.W.3d 894, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1056, 2011 WL 3567495
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 16, 2011·No. WD 71867·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Tarchechee Chambers was found guilty of first-degree burglary and violation of an order of protection. He appeals, arguing that the trial court erred by allowing testimony regarding the victim’s post-incident conduct, and by permitting the State to highlight the uncontroverted nature of its evidence during closing argument, which purportedly shifted the burden of proof to Chambers and indirectly commented upon his failure to testify. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Chambers, 345 S.W.3d 894, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1056, 2011 WL 3567495 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

345 S.W.3d 894 (State v. Chambers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Powe
345 S.W.3d 894 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)