State v. Challstrom

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Challstrom

196 S.W.3d 671, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1118, 2006 WL 2050991

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 25, 2006·No. No. WD 65687·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Challstrom appeals his conviction for unlawful use of a weapon, section 571.030. He presents three points on appeal. First, he claims the trial court abused its discretion in excluding a serologist’s testimony and report at trial. Second, he claims the trial court erred in overruling his motion for judgment of acquittal and in sentencing him for unlawful use of a weapon. Finally, he claims the trial court abused its discretion in admitting certain photographs into evidence at trial. Mr. Challstrom’s points are denied, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Challstrom appeals his conviction for unlawful use of a weapon, section 571.030. He presents three points on appeal. First, he claims the trial court abused its discretion in excluding a serologist’s testimony and report at trial. Second, he claims the trial court erred in overruling his motion for judgment of acquittal and in sentencing him for unlawful use of a weapon. Finally, he claims the trial court abused its discretion in admitting certain photographs into evidence at trial. Mr. Challstrom’s points are denied, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25.

State v. Challstrom, 196 S.W.3d 671, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1118, 2006 WL 2050991 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

196 S.W.3d 671 (State v. Challstrom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.