State v. Chalk

333 S.W.3d 534, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 353, 2011 WL 900029
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 15, 2011·No. ED 94487·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carole A. Chalk (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon her conviction by a jury for the class C felony of abuse of a child, in violation of Section 568.060, RSMo Cum.Supp.2007, 1 and for which Defendant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to ten years’ imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find Defendant is entitled to no relief on appeal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo Cum. Supp.2007 unless otherwise noted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Chalk, 333 S.W.3d 534, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 353, 2011 WL 900029 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

333 S.W.3d 534 (State v. Chalk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. State
333 S.W.3d 534 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)