State v. Chadwick

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Chadwick

268 N.W. 638, 198 Minn. 619

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedOctober 16, 1936

DocketNo. 30,959.

StatusPublished

This text of 268 N.W. 638 (State v. Chadwick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Chadwick, 268 N.W. 638, 198 Minn. 619 (Mich. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant appeals from a municipal court judgment convicting him of selling liquor without a license in violation of an ordinance of the city of Minneapolis. The evidence offered on behalf of the state overwhelmingly warranted a conviction. It was not contradicted. Defendant’s attempt to explain it away was so absurd and inconsistent with the plain dictates of common sense that no credence could possibly be given to his story.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant appeals from a municipal court judgment convicting him of selling liquor without a license in violation of an ordinance of the city of Minneapolis. The evidence offered on behalf of the state overwhelmingly warranted a conviction. It was not contradicted. Defendant’s attempt to explain it away was so absurd and inconsistent with the plain dictates of common sense that no credence could possibly be given to his story.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 N.W. 638, 198 Minn. 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-chadwick-minn-1936.