State v. Chadwick

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Chadwick

268 N.W. 638, 198 Minn. 619

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided October 16, 1936·No. No. 30,959.·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant appeals from a municipal court judgment convicting him of selling liquor without a license in violation of an ordinance of the city of Minneapolis. The evidence offered on behalf of the state overwhelmingly warranted a conviction. It was not contradicted. Defendant’s attempt to explain it away was so absurd and inconsistent with the plain dictates of common sense that no credence could possibly be given to his story.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant appeals from a municipal court judgment convicting him of selling liquor without a license in violation of an ordinance of the city of Minneapolis. The evidence offered on behalf of the state overwhelmingly warranted a conviction. It was not contradicted. Defendant’s attempt to explain it away was so absurd and inconsistent with the plain dictates of common sense that no credence could possibly be given to his story.

The judgment is affirmed.

State v. Chadwick, 268 N.W. 638, 198 Minn. 619 (Mich. 1936).

Pincite

268 N.W. 638 (State v. Chadwick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.