Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Chacon

State v. Chacon

870 P.2d 271, 127 Or. App. 130, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 383
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMarch 23, 1994
Docket10-92-03788; CA A76783
StatusPublished

This text of 870 P.2d 271 (State v. Chacon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Chacon, 870 P.2d 271, 127 Or. App. 130, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 383 (Or. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant pled guilty to unlawful possession and delivery of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He appeals the length of the post-prison supervision term. The state argues that, because defendant pled guilty pursuant to a plea agreement, review is precluded under State v. Adams, 315 Or 359, 847 P2d 397 (1993), and State v. Johnston, 120 Or App 165, 851 P2d 1156 (1993), rev den 317 Or 272 (1993), and that the 1993 amendment to ORS 138.222(2)(d) does not assist defendant.

We do not address the scope of our review under the amended provision. Defendant concurred in the 36-month post-prison supervision term at sentencing.1 We decline to exercise our discretion to review the unpreserved claim of error. See State v. McEahern, 126 Or App 201, 867 P2d 568 (1994).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. McEahern
867 P.2d 568 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1994)
State v. Johnston
851 P.2d 1156 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1993)
State v. Adams
847 P.2d 397 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
870 P.2d 271, 127 Or. App. 130, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-chacon-orctapp-1994.