State v. Cerrito
This text of 595 So. 2d 247 (State v. Cerrito) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ON REMAND
Based on State v. Hunter, 586 So.2d 319 (Fla.1991) we reverse the order of the trial court dismissing the charges against appellees Cerrito, Blanco and Copa. The facts of this case do not rise to entrapment as a matter of law. See Cruz v. State, 465 So.2d 516 (Fla.), cert, denied, 473 U.S. 905, 105 S.Ct. 3527, 87 L.Ed.2d 652 (1985). Furthermore, as to Blanco and Copa neither claims of entrapment nor due process are available as a defense to the charges. See State v. Hunter, 586 So.2d 319 (Fla.1991); State v. Garcia, 528 So.2d 76 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), rev. denied, 536 So.2d 244 (Fla.1988).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
595 So. 2d 247, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1885, 1992 WL 38338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cerrito-fladistctapp-1992.