State v. Ceresne
535 So. 2d 360, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 157, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 8, 1989 WL 89
Opinion
We reverse the trial court’s order of dismissal because we find, in view of the state’s traverse, an issue of fact exists on the counts dismissed by the trial court. See State v. Oberholtzer, 411 So.2d 376 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 419 So.2d 1199 (Fla.1982); State v. Booker, 529 So.2d 1239 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Ceresne, 535 So. 2d 360, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 157, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 8, 1989 WL 89 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
535 So. 2d 360 (State v. Ceresne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Booker
529 So. 2d 1239 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
State v. Oberholtzer
411 So. 2d 376 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)