State v. Ceresne
535 So. 2d 360, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 157, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 8, 1989 WL 89
This text of 535 So. 2d 360 (State v. Ceresne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Ceresne, 535 So. 2d 360, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 157, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 8, 1989 WL 89 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
Opinion
We reverse the trial court’s order of dismissal because we find, in view of the state’s traverse, an issue of fact exists on the counts dismissed by the trial court. See State v. Oberholtzer, 411 So.2d 376 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 419 So.2d 1199 (Fla.1982); State v. Booker, 529 So.2d 1239 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Booker
529 So. 2d 1239 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
State v. Oberholtzer
411 So. 2d 376 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
535 So. 2d 360, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 157, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 8, 1989 WL 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ceresne-fladistctapp-1989.