State v. Centeno

769 A.2d 63, 255 Conn. 950, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 94
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided March 15, 2001·No. SC 16494·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 61 Conn. App. 906 (AC 20184), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, with respect to the question of whether one of the jurors and the defendant knew each other from a prior, possibly criminal relationship, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in not inquiring or investigating further?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Centeno, 769 A.2d 63, 255 Conn. 950, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 94 (Colo. 2001).

769 A.2d 63 (State v. Centeno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Centeno
787 A.2d 537 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2002)