State v. Centeno

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Centeno

769 A.2d 63, 255 Conn. 950, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 94

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedMarch 15, 2001

DocketSC 16494

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 769 A.2d 63 (State v. Centeno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Centeno, 769 A.2d 63, 255 Conn. 950, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 94 (Colo. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 61 Conn. App. 906 (AC 20184), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, with respect to the question of whether one of the jurors and the defendant knew each other from a prior, possibly criminal relationship, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in not inquiring or investigating further?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 61 Conn. App. 906 (AC 20184), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, with respect to the question of whether one of the jurors and the defendant knew each other from a prior, possibly criminal relationship, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in not inquiring or investigating further?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

769 A.2d 63, 255 Conn. 950, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-centeno-conn-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack