State v. Centafanti
898 N.E.2d 45, 120 Ohio St. 3d 275
Opinion
{¶ 1} The trial court order and the opinion of the court of appeals in this case were premised upon the application of R.C. 2941.401. Because appellee was incarcerated in a federal prison in Ohio rather than in a “correctional institution of this state,” see R.C. 2941.401 and 2967.01, R.C. 2941.401 does not apply.
{¶ 2} Accordingly, this case is remanded to the court of appeals for further proceedings to determine the statute that properly applies and whether the requirements of that statute were satisfied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Centafanti, 898 N.E.2d 45, 120 Ohio St. 3d 275 (Ohio 2008).
898 N.E.2d 45 (State v. Centafanti) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Moore
2014 Ohio 4879 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)
State v. Payne
2014 Ohio 4326 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)
State v. Barrett
945 N.E.2d 1070 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2010)