State v. Celli

New York Court of Appeals

State v. Celli

356 N.E.2d 275, 40 N.Y.2d 833, 387 N.Y.S.2d 831, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3005

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 14, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 356 N.E.2d 275 (State v. Celli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Celli, 356 N.E.2d 275, 40 N.Y.2d 833, 387 N.Y.S.2d 831, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3005 (N.Y. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum. Judgments dismissing the petitions affirmed, without costs. Apart from any other consideration which these appeals may suggest, the matters which gave rise to them have become moot, in substance, albeit not in form. On argument it was conceded, what was implicit anyway in the briefing, that the pending prosecutions would never be progressed. Moreover, the only reason assigned for not making motions to dismiss the indictments or to discontinue their prosecution was the existence of stays granted by this court. Those stays were vacated by oral decision in open court during the argument of the appeals. Nothing remains to deter a final resolution.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.

In each case: Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum. Judgments dismissing the petitions affirmed, without costs. Apart from any other consideration which these appeals may suggest, the matters which gave rise to them have become moot, in substance, albeit not in form. On argument it was conceded, what was implicit anyway in the briefing, that the pending prosecutions would never be progressed. Moreover, the only reason assigned for not making motions to dismiss the indictments or to discontinue their prosecution was the existence of stays granted by this court. Those stays were vacated by oral decision in open court during the argument of the appeals. Nothing remains to deter a final resolution.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.

In each case: Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

356 N.E.2d 275, 40 N.Y.2d 833, 387 N.Y.S.2d 831, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3005, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-celli-ny-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack