State v. Celestine

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Celestine

71 So. 3d 265, 2011 La. LEXIS 2277, 2011 WL 4643867

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedSeptember 26, 2011

Docket2011-KK-2081

StatusPublished

This text of 71 So. 3d 265 (State v. Celestine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Celestine, 71 So. 3d 265, 2011 La. LEXIS 2277, 2011 WL 4643867 (La. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. F, No. 504-656; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-1237.

Writ granted. Reversed and remanded. The waiver of defendant’s constitutional right to trial by jury was valid. It occurred no later than forty-five days before trial, and it was made by defense counsel in the defendant’s presence in open court. State v. McNair, 11-1285 (La.6/21/11), 64 So.3d 205. The record also contains a sufficient affirmative showing that defendant was adequately informed of his rights to support a finding that the waiver was made knowingly and intelligently. Therefore, defendant’s waiver was irrevocable, and the trial judge did not abuse his discretion by denying defendant’s motion to reinstate jury trial. The court of appeal is *266 reversed, and the ruling of the trial court is reinstated. The case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

JOHNSON and WEIMER, JJ., would deny.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. F, No. 504-656; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-1237.

Writ granted. Reversed and remanded. The waiver of defendant’s constitutional right to trial by jury was valid. It occurred no later than forty-five days before trial, and it was made by defense counsel in the defendant’s presence in open court. State v. McNair, 11-1285 (La.6/21/11), 64 So.3d 205. The record also contains a sufficient affirmative showing that defendant was adequately informed of his rights to support a finding that the waiver was made knowingly and intelligently. Therefore, defendant’s waiver was irrevocable, and the trial judge did not abuse his discretion by denying defendant’s motion to reinstate jury trial. The court of appeal is *266 reversed, and the ruling of the trial court is reinstated. The case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

JOHNSON and WEIMER, JJ., would deny.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 So. 3d 265, 2011 La. LEXIS 2277, 2011 WL 4643867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-celestine-la-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack