Home/Hawaii Supreme Court/State v. Celestine.

State v. Celestine.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Celestine.. Read the opinion of the Court — 142 Haw. 165 →
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided October 28, 2016·No. SCWC-14-0000335·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-14-0000335 28-OCT-2016 12:40 PM

SCWC-14-0000335

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Respondent, v.

RITALYNN MOSS CELESTINE, Petitioner.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-14-0000335; CASE NO. 1DTA-13-00956)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner’s application for writ of certiorari, filed on September 16, 2016, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, October 28, 2016.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Celestine., (haw 2016).

State v. Celestine. (State v. Celestine.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.