State v. Celestine.
This text of State v. Celestine. (State v. Celestine.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-14-0000335 28-OCT-2016 12:40 PM
SCWC-14-0000335
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Respondent,
v.
RITALYNN MOSS CELESTINE, Petitioner.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-14-0000335; CASE NO. 1DTA-13-00956)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner’s application for writ of certiorari, filed
on September 16, 2016, is hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be
heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant
to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move
for retention of oral argument.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, October 28, 2016.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Celestine., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-celestine-haw-2016.