State v. Cecil

2 Mart. 208
CourtSuperior Court of Louisiana
DecidedJuly 1, 1812
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Mart. 208 (State v. Cecil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Cecil, 2 Mart. 208 (La. Super. Ct. 1812).

Opinion

By the Court.

The woman being of colour, the presumption is that she was born free. Adele vs. Beauregard, 1 Martin 183. But this presumption is destroyed by the declaration of her former master. This declaration, however, must be taken in toto, and it establishes her emancipation. [209]*209in the same breath. Neither are we ready to say that when. in the trail of a cause, a fact comes incidentally and collaterally to be proved, the rules of evidence are as strictly to be insisted on, as when the facts put in issue are to be made out. In the latter case, the party has previous notice and time to procure the best testimony, which consequently will be renuired. Not so in the former case as on a motion for a new trial or for a continuance-when a witness is examined on the voir dire.

Witness sworn.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. Belmonti
11 Rob. 339 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1845)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Mart. 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cecil-lasuperct-1812.