State v. Cecil

Supreme Court of Florida

State v. Cecil

518 So. 2d 919, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 51, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 126, 1988 WL 4376

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJanuary 21, 1988

DocketNo. 70468

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 518 So. 2d 919 (State v. Cecil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Cecil, 518 So. 2d 919, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 51, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 126, 1988 WL 4376 (Fla. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review State v. Cecil, 508 So.2d 1249, 1250 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), which certified the following question:

Whether the state is precluded from seeking common law certiorari review of non-appealable interlocutory orders in criminal cases.

We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have resolved this question in State v. Pettis, 520 So.2d 250 (Fla.1988), which held that the state is not precluded from seeking review of interlocutory orders by common law certiorari. Thus, we quash the decision below and remand for proceedings consistent with that opinion.

It is so ordered.

EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur. MCDONALD, C.J., and OVERTON, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI