State v. Cecil
518 So. 2d 919, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 51, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 126, 1988 WL 4376
Opinion
We have for review State v. Cecil, 508 So.2d 1249, 1250 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), which certified the following question:
Whether the state is precluded from seeking common law certiorari review of non-appealable interlocutory orders in criminal cases.
We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have resolved this question in State v. Pettis, 520 So.2d 250 (Fla.1988), which held that the state is not precluded from seeking review of interlocutory orders by common law certiorari. Thus, we quash the decision below and remand for proceedings consistent with that opinion.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Cecil, 518 So. 2d 919, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 51, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 126, 1988 WL 4376 (Fla. 1988).
518 So. 2d 919 (State v. Cecil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Diamond
553 So. 2d 1185 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
State v. Cecil
533 So. 2d 884 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
State v. Filipowich
528 So. 2d 511 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)