State v. Cayson, Unpublished Decision (4-21-2006)

Ohio Court of Appeals

State v. Cayson, Unpublished Decision (4-21-2006)

2006 Ohio 2011

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 21, 2006

DocketNo. 2004-T-0118.

StatusUnpublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 2006 Ohio 2011 (State v. Cayson, Unpublished Decision (4-21-2006)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Cayson, Unpublished Decision (4-21-2006), 2006 Ohio 2011 (Ohio Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION {¶ 1} Appellant, Michael Cayson ("Cayson"), appeals the judgment entered by the Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas. Cayson received a total prison term of nine years for his convictions of felonious assault, abduction, and having a weapon while under disability.

{¶ 2} The relevant facts established at trial are as follows. The victim in this matter was Tricia Brown ("Brown"). Brown and Cayson had a relationship that lasted approximately three years. Both Cayson and Brown maintained separate residences. At the time of the offense, Brown lived in a residence on Jefferson Street in Warren, Ohio. She testified that during their relationship, Cayson had visited her at that house numerous times, had spent the night there, and, at one time, had a key. The relationship ended in September 2003.

{¶ 3} Cayson was a truck driver. On October 12, 2003, he called Brown and told her he was out of town at a truck stop. Brown testified that Cayson may have said he was in Maryland.

{¶ 4} D

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION {¶ 1} Appellant, Michael Cayson ("Cayson"), appeals the judgment entered by the Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas. Cayson received a total prison term of nine years for his convictions of felonious assault, abduction, and having a weapon while under disability.

{¶ 2} The relevant facts established at trial are as follows. The victim in this matter was Tricia Brown ("Brown"). Brown and Cayson had a relationship that lasted approximately three years. Both Cayson and Brown maintained separate residences. At the time of the offense, Brown lived in a residence on Jefferson Street in Warren, Ohio. She testified that during their relationship, Cayson had visited her at that house numerous times, had spent the night there, and, at one time, had a key. The relationship ended in September 2003.

{¶ 3} Cayson was a truck driver. On October 12, 2003, he called Brown and told her he was out of town at a truck stop. Brown testified that Cayson may have said he was in Maryland.

{¶ 4} D

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2006 Ohio 2011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cayson-unpublished-decision-4-21-2006-ohioctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack