State v. Cayce

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Cayce

541 S.W.3d 716

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 20, 2018·No. No. ED 105241·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Brian Damar Cayce ("Appellant") appeals from the trial court's judgment following a jury trial convicting him of one count of the class B felony of unlawful use of a weapon, in violation of Section 571.030 (RSMo. 2000 ), and one count of the class C felony of unlawful possession of a firearm, in violation of Section 571.070. Appellant was sentenced to concurrent terms of fifteen and seven years' imprisonment, respectively.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information *717only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Brian Damar Cayce ("Appellant") appeals from the trial court's judgment following a jury trial convicting him of one count of the class B felony of unlawful use of a weapon, in violation of Section 571.030 (RSMo. 2000 ), and one count of the class C felony of unlawful possession of a firearm, in violation of Section 571.070. Appellant was sentenced to concurrent terms of fifteen and seven years' imprisonment, respectively.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information *717only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Cayce, 541 S.W.3d 716 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

541 S.W.3d 716 (State v. Cayce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.