State v. Cawthra
617 A.2d 183, 29 Conn. App. 919, 1992 Conn. App. LEXIS 461
This text of 617 A.2d 183 (State v. Cawthra) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Cawthra, 617 A.2d 183, 29 Conn. App. 919, 1992 Conn. App. LEXIS 461 (Colo. Ct. App. 1992).
Opinion
The state concedes and we agree that the instructions of the trial court constitute reversible error.
The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
617 A.2d 183, 29 Conn. App. 919, 1992 Conn. App. LEXIS 461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cawthra-connappct-1992.