State v. Cavendish

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Cavendish

562 So. 2d 698, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2574, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6147, 1989 WL 133058

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 8, 1989

DocketNo. 89-0424

StatusPublished

This text of 562 So. 2d 698 (State v. Cavendish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Cavendish, 562 So. 2d 698, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2574, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6147, 1989 WL 133058 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellee’s conviction. However, we withhold issuance of the mandate pending the Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Burch, 545 So.2d 279 (Fla.4th DCA 1989), review pending, Burch v. State, Case No. 73,826.

We reverse the sentence imposed because the trial court failed to state its reasons in writing for its two-cell downward departure from the sentencing guidelines. We remand this case to the trial court with instructions to state its reasons in writing for the downward departure or in the alternative, if the trial court elects to sentence within the guidelines’ range, to permit appellee to withdraw his plea. See State v. Sims, 530 So.2d 1089 (Fla.4th DCA 1988).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI