State v. Cave

308 S.W.3d 265, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 461, 2010 WL 1460304
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 13, 2010
DocketED 93016
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 308 S.W.3d 265 (State v. Cave) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Cave, 308 S.W.3d 265, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 461, 2010 WL 1460304 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert L. Cave appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of statutory sodomy in the first degree in violation of Section 566.062 RSMo 2000. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2009).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cave v. State
401 S.W.3d 565 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
308 S.W.3d 265, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 461, 2010 WL 1460304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cave-moctapp-2010.