State v. Cavaness

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Cavaness

844 S.W.2d 595, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 75, 1993 WL 7024

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 19, 1993·No. Nos. 60272, 61653·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of two counts of second degree assault, § 565.060, RSMo 1986. We affirm. The evidence in support of the jury verdict [596]*596is not insufficient and no error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this or-

der affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of two counts of second degree assault, § 565.060, RSMo 1986. We affirm. The evidence in support of the jury verdict [596]*596is not insufficient and no error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this or-

der affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

State v. Cavaness, 844 S.W.2d 595, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 75, 1993 WL 7024 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

844 S.W.2d 595 (State v. Cavaness) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.