State v. Caulley

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Caulley

2013 Ohio 3673, 995 N.E.2d 227, 136 Ohio St. 3d 325

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 5, 2013

Docket2012-1974

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 2013 Ohio 3673 (State v. Caulley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Caulley, 2013 Ohio 3673, 995 N.E.2d 227, 136 Ohio St. 3d 325 (Ohio 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Forrest, 136 Ohio St.3d 134, 2013-Ohio-2409, 991 N.E.2d 1124.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lanzinger, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. O’Donnell and Kennedy, JJ., dissent. *326 Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Seth L. Gilbert, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Kimberly S. Rigby, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Forrest, 136 Ohio St.3d 134, 2013-Ohio-2409, 991 N.E.2d 1124.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lanzinger, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. O’Donnell and Kennedy, JJ., dissent. *326 Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Seth L. Gilbert, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Kimberly S. Rigby, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2013 Ohio 3673, 995 N.E.2d 227, 136 Ohio St. 3d 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-caulley-ohio-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack