State v. Caulley

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Caulley

2013 Ohio 3673, 995 N.E.2d 227, 136 Ohio St. 3d 325

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 5, 2013·No. 2012-1974·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Forrest, 136 Ohio St.3d 134, 2013-Ohio-2409, 991 N.E.2d 1124.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lanzinger, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. O’Donnell and Kennedy, JJ., dissent. *326 Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Seth L. Gilbert, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Kimberly S. Rigby, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Forrest, 136 Ohio St.3d 134, 2013-Ohio-2409, 991 N.E.2d 1124.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lanzinger, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. O’Donnell and Kennedy, JJ., dissent. *326 Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Seth L. Gilbert, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Kimberly S. Rigby, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.

State v. Caulley, 2013 Ohio 3673, 995 N.E.2d 227, 136 Ohio St. 3d 325 (Ohio 2013).

Pincite

2013 Ohio 3673 (State v. Caulley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related