State v. Catchings

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Catchings

894 S.W.2d 213, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 341, 1995 WL 78270

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 28, 1995·No. No. 65068·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted defendant of first degree robbery and the trial court sentenced him to twenty years. He appeals that judgment, as well as the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. Rule 30.25(b). However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The motion court’s judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b). No error of law appears.

The judgments are affirmed pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted defendant of first degree robbery and the trial court sentenced him to twenty years. He appeals that judgment, as well as the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. Rule 30.25(b). However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The motion court’s judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b). No error of law appears.

The judgments are affirmed pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

State v. Catchings, 894 S.W.2d 213, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 341, 1995 WL 78270 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

894 S.W.2d 213 (State v. Catchings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.