State v. Casugay-Badiang

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Casugay-Badiang. Read the opinion of the Court — 130 Haw. 21
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided January 2, 2013·No. SCWC-11-0000802·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-11-0000802

02-JAN-2013

12:43 PM

SCWC-11-0000802

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant, vs.

RUBIN IKOA CASUGAY-BADIANG, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-11-0000802; CR. NO. 11-1-0523)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND ORDERING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee Rubin Ikoa Casugay-

Badiang’s application for writ of certiorari filed on November 16, 2012, is hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument.

The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each of the parties shall file a supplemental brief by January 31, 2013, not to exceed ten

pages in length, addressing the effect (if any) of State v. Lau, 73 Haw. 259, 831 P.2d 523 (1992) on this appeal.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 2, 2013.

Summer M. M. Kupau /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

James M. Anderson for respondent /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Casugay-Badiang, (haw 2013).

State v. Casugay-Badiang (State v. Casugay-Badiang) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Lau
831 P.2d 523 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1992)