State v. CASTRONOVA

Arizona Supreme Court

State v. CASTRONOVA

228 P.3d 113, 224 Ariz. 121, 2010 Ariz. LEXIS 24

Arizona Supreme Court·Decided January 12, 2010·No. CR-09-0177-PR·Published

Opinion

ORDER

After hearing oral argument and considering the parties’ supplemental filings, it appears to the Court that the grant of review in this case was improvident. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. The Order granting review is vacated;

2. The Petition for Review is denied; and

3. The Court of Appeals Opinion shall be depublished, pursuant to Rule 111(g), Rules of the Supreme Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

After hearing oral argument and considering the parties’ supplemental filings, it appears to the Court that the grant of review in this case was improvident. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. The Order granting review is vacated;

2. The Petition for Review is denied; and

3. The Court of Appeals Opinion shall be depublished, pursuant to Rule 111(g), Rules of the Supreme Court.

State v. CASTRONOVA, 228 P.3d 113, 224 Ariz. 121, 2010 Ariz. LEXIS 24 (Ark. 2010).

Pincite

228 P.3d 113 (State v. CASTRONOVA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

1. The Order granting review is vacated;

2. The Petition for Review is denied; and

Related