State v. Castro

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Castro. Read the opinion of the Court — 128 Haw. 115
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided June 13, 2012·No. SCWC-30703·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-30703 13-JUN-2012

NO. SCWC-30703 10:12 AM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

DANYELA CASTRO,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (ICA NO. 30703; CR. NO. 1DTA-10-01758)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Mckenna, JJ., and Circuit Judge Border, in place of Duffy, J., recused)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Danyela Castro’s application for writ of certiorari filed on May, 3, 2012, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument Dated: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 13, 2012.

Richard L. Holcomb, /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald Holcomb Law LLLC, on the application for /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Petitioner/Defendant- Appellant /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Patrick Border

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Castro, (haw 2012).

State v. Castro (State v. Castro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.