State v. Castillon

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Castillon. Read the opinion of the Court — 443 P.3d 98
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided November 29, 2017·No. SCWC-16-0000421·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-16-0000421 29-NOV-2017 04:29 PM

SCWC-16-0000421

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

MICHELLE HELEN CASTILLON, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-16-0000421; CASE NO. 3DTC-15-042273)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Michelle Helen Castillon’s application for writ of certiorari filed on October 11, 2017, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 29, 2017.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Castillon, (haw 2017).

State v. Castillon (State v. Castillon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.