State v. Castillo

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Castillo

150 A.3d 684, 323 Conn. 903, 2016 Conn. LEXIS 267

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedSeptember 13, 2016

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 150 A.3d 684 (State v. Castillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Castillo, 150 A.3d 684, 323 Conn. 903, 2016 Conn. LEXIS 267 (Colo. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 165 Conn.App. 703, 140 A.3d 301 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the defendant was not in custody for Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 478-79, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), purposes during his in-home interrogation by the police?

"3. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that it was inappropriate or premature for that court to consider the defendant's supervisory claim?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 165 Conn.App. 703, 140 A.3d 301 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the defendant was not in custody for Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 478-79, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), purposes during his in-home interrogation by the police?

"3. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that it was inappropriate or premature for that court to consider the defendant's supervisory claim?"

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 A.3d 684, 323 Conn. 903, 2016 Conn. LEXIS 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-castillo-conn-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack