State v. Cassiday

582 So. 2d 1191, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2728, 1991 WL 107111
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 29, 1991·No. No. 90-314·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal, the state challenges the dismissal of an amended information by which it sought to charge the appellees with grand theft. The appellees had sought dismissal of the information on numerous grounds, and the circuit court dismissed the information without explanation of its reasons for doing so. Because we are unable to determine the basis for the dismissal, we remand the case for entry of an order which sets forth the trial court’s grounds for dismissal.

BOOTH and MINER, JJ., and WENTWORTH, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Cassiday, 582 So. 2d 1191, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2728, 1991 WL 107111 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

582 So. 2d 1191 (State v. Cassiday) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

PHH MENTAL HEALTH SERV., INC. v. New York Times Co.
582 So. 2d 1191 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)